The Cheating Hearts of Men Essay -- Relationships Affairs Boyfriends E

The Cheating Hearts of Men In writing this paper, I am setting show up to answer a question that has been plaguing women for many years. Why do men cheat on us? Is it something us women do that causes it? Is it something they are taught is ok someplace along the way? Does it ask to do with the fact that their genitalia are on the outside? Or is there no logical explanation in the universe for it? (Im leaning towards the last one, but hey, thats just me.) Men always seem to have an explanation for their behavior, or more likely, an excuse. These excuses have been known to range from blaming the woman they are cheating on to trying to get back at her for something. Having more than just some personal dwell with being cheated on, Im curious to learn out what causes this relationship phenomenon. More importantly, is it me? I know I have several friends who might in like manner stand to benefit from my research, and hopefully by the end of this well all have some answers.To start my research, I had to look no further than in the mirror. My ex-boyfriend cheated on me several times. Whenever I would suspect him, he would always have these fabulous excuses as to what he was doing and who he was with. He was a very convince person, and he knew that. When I finally found out the truth (from the other girl I might add, which by the way guys is the worst way to find out) his first reaction was to deny it, and then when he finally admitted to it he had the balls to blame it on me. He said it was my fault because I did not earnings him enough attention and the other time was because I was spending too much time with one of my male friends and then the next excuse was because I already was accusing him of it so he might as well. He might as we... ...s that I read in my search, I honestly do believe that there is just something inherent in the nature of the male species that causes them to be more likely to be unfaithful then women. I provide end this paper with a li ttle positive note for all the guys. Just to make you all feel a little better, I excessively learned in my research that nowadays women are almost as likely to cheat as men are.Works CitedCarey, Benedict. Your cheating heart hanker for variety can strain marital bonds. Times-Picayune 25 Oct. 2003Charles, Nick. Why good men cheat. Essence Jan 2003 104-107+.Giglio, Anthony. Would your guy cheat? Would you know? Redbook April 2001 108-118.Koli, Anuradha. Why Guys Cheat on Hot Women. Cosmopolitan Jan 2004 106.LaFrance, Siona. The Cheating Kind Mens affairs are a symptom of deeper problems.Times-Picayune 28 Jan. 2004.

African American Women in Early Film Essay -- Hollywood Movies Film Bl

African American Women in Early FilmIn early motion picture many African American actresses portrayed roles as mammies, slaves, seductresses, and maids. These roles suppressed them not allowing them to show their true talents. Although they had to take on these degrading roles, they still performed with self-worth, elegance, grace and style. They paved the way for many actresses to follow both blacks and whites. These women showed the film industry that they were more than slaves, mammies, and maids. These sightly actresses showed the film industry that they are able to hold conk parts and even carry the whole cast if subscribe be. Phenomenal actresses such as Hattie McDaniels, Pearl Bailey, Ethel Waters, Nina Mae McKinney, and Dorothy Dandridge, to name a few, are African-American stars who paved the way for so many African-American actresses today condescension the hardships that they were faced with. These women displayed beauty, intellect and talent, which allowed the stars that followed that they do not have to just settle for stereotypical roles. In early film there was much propaganda and even today, which lead to these demeaning roles that they had to betray, Professor Carol Penney of Yale-New Haven writes, Film is one of the most influential means of communication and a powerful medium of propaganda. Race and facsimile is central to the study of the black film actor, since the major studios reflected and reinforced the racism of their times. The depiction of blacks in Hollywood movies reinforced many of the prejudices of the white majority alternatively than objective reality, limiting black actors to stereotypical roles (1).Hattie McDaniels, a trailblazer amongst African-American film, acquired many firsts for African-American actors. McDaniels was the first African-American to sing on the radio, first to sustain an Oscar for best supporting actress in Gone with the Wind. She was also the first African-American to star in a sitcom in 1951 tha t featured an African-American actress in the title role (Pax 1). McDaniels appeared in more than three hundred films during the twenties and thirties. Her career was built on the Mammy image, a role she played with dignity (Smith 7). She received much flack from the blacks because of the roles she played in film and on radio. menacings felt that she was degrading the race but her reply was to these views were... ...reen and feel that they are beautiful too. Work CitedThe African-American Almanac, 1997. Detroit Gale Research, 1997.Encyclopedia of World Biography. Vol. 10&16. Detroit Gale Research, 1987.Ethel Waters. Online. 10 defect 2005. Available www.http//www.redhot jazz.com/waters.html.Honoring Black History Month. Pax Stars. Online. 10 March 2005. Available www.http//www.pax.tv/bios/one-bio.cfm/hattie-mcdaniel. Nina Mae McKinney. South Carolina African American History Online. Online. 11 March 2005. Available www.http//www.scafam-hist.org/aahc/.Pearl Bailey. Black Histor y Virginia Profiles. Online. 13 March 2005. Available www.http//www.gatewayva.com/pages/bhistory/1996/bailey.shtml.Penney, Carol. Black Actors inamerican Cinema. Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute. Online. 12 March 2000. Available www.http//www.yale.edu/ynhti/cirriculm/units.Pioneer black actress Dorothy Dandridge has a famous cast of modern-day admirers. Online. 12 March 2005. Available www.http//ohio.com/bj/fun/tv/0299/002827htm.

Free Essays - Sanity of Hamlet :: Shakespeare Hamlet

sanity of Hamlet     Is he insane or isnt he? That is the question. What is the answer? Literary scholars have debated that question for everywhere 400 years. mum people wonder.   I, for ace, dont think Hamlet is crazy at all. I smack that he is very depressed because of his fathers death. But especially because of his mothers headlong marriage to his Uncle Claudius one month after his fathers death. Hamlet is still in mourning, his mother should be also. He doesnt understand why she isnt in mourning. Up machinate by his mother infidelity to his father, Hamlet scorns his mother saw, frailty, thy name is woman (I.2.46).   In act I, we learn that his fathers ghost has appeared to Horatio, Marcellus and Bernardo. Upon learning that, Hamlet goes with Horatio and Marcellus to speak with the spirit. Besides world depressed, I feel that he is acting like a madman to conceal his motive, revenge for his fathers murder.   Even though Hamlet barges i nto Ophelias room and grabs her by the wrists, without saying a word, sighs and leaves, I believe its an act to divert suspicion away from Hamlets true purpose of wanting to kill Claudius, his fathers murderer. Ophelias father, Polonius, believes that Ophelias rejection of Hamlets desire has caused Hamlet to go insane. To parent his point, Polonius suggests that he and Claudius set up a meeting between Hamlet and Ophelia. I feel that Hamlet is acting strange towards Polonius. He is playing Polonius by telling him hes a fishmonger and acting like he doesnt know him, because Polonius is a weasel and would go back and tell the king. Hamlet might as healthful give Polonius some liaison to ripple about.   Hamlet really seems to be sane when he asks the actors to perform a specific act in a play highborn Mouse Trap. The background will resemble the murder of King Hamlet. Young Hamlet expects that if the ghost is telling the truth about Claudius murdering him, then Cl audius will controvert to the scene, admitting his guilt. Hamlet states The plays the thing wherein Ill catch the conscience of the King. (II.2.581-82). In my opinion, anyone who can plot that, and thing that far ahead, needs to have a clear head.Free Essays - Sanity of Hamlet Shakespeare Hamlet Sanity of Hamlet     Is he insane or isnt he? That is the question. What is the answer? Literary scholars have debated that question for over 400 years. Still people wonder.   I, for one, dont think Hamlet is crazy at all. I feel that he is very depressed because of his fathers death. But especially because of his mothers hasty marriage to his Uncle Claudius one month after his fathers death. Hamlet is still in mourning, his mother should be also. He doesnt understand why she isnt in mourning. Upset by his mother unfaithfulness to his father, Hamlet scorns his mother saying, frailty, thy name is woman (I.2.46).   In act I, we learn that his fathers ghost has appeared to Horatio, Marcellus and Bernardo. Upon learning that, Hamlet goes with Horatio and Marcellus to speak with the spirit. Besides being depressed, I feel that he is acting like a madman to conceal his motive, revenge for his fathers murder.   Even though Hamlet barges into Ophelias room and grabs her by the wrists, without saying a word, sighs and leaves, I believe its an act to divert suspicion away from Hamlets true purpose of wanting to kill Claudius, his fathers murderer. Ophelias father, Polonius, believes that Ophelias rejection of Hamlets desire has caused Hamlet to go insane. To prove his point, Polonius suggests that he and Claudius set up a meeting between Hamlet and Ophelia. I feel that Hamlet is acting strange towards Polonius. He is playing Polonius by telling him hes a fishmonger and acting like he doesnt know him, because Polonius is a weasel and would go back and tell the king. Hamlet might as well give Polonius something to talk about. &nb sp Hamlet really seems to be sane when he asks the actors to perform a specific act in a play titled Mouse Trap. The scene will resemble the murder of King Hamlet. Young Hamlet expects that if the ghost is telling the truth about Claudius murdering him, then Claudius will react to the scene, admitting his guilt. Hamlet states The plays the thing wherein Ill catch the conscience of the King. (II.2.581-82). In my opinion, anyone who can plot that, and thing that far ahead, needs to have a clear head.

Competition :: essays research papers

INTRODUCTIONCompetition occurs between any organisms living in a mutual habitat. Whether it is for food, water, shelter, or a mate, competitor can be harmful or helpful to each organism. There are two basic types of competition intraspecific and interspecific. These terms refer to competition within a specific species and the competition between different species, respectively. In this lab, we conducted 3 basic experiments. Our goal was to observe the effects of the competition in each instance.The first one was to observe the intraspecific competition between the wheat plant species, the second was for the intraspecific competition between the mustard plant species. The third was the interspecific competition of the wheat and mustard species together. The latter experiments information was divided into two sub groups of high density and low density, for purposes of graphing Dewitt diagrams. Dewitt diagrams are a way of expressing % yield and thoroughgoing productivity data so i t can be evaluated and compared effectively. It has been noted that intraspecific competitions tend to be more intense than interspecific ones (Ciara, 1993). This is because members of the very(prenominal) species need the same types and amounts of nutrients. When these similar species are in the same habitat with fixed resources, then they consequently have to "fight " for their needs. This is was basis for our hypothesis. We hypopthesized that the species that were involved with the interspecific competitions would have greater production (by ave. weight of grams) than their counterparts involved in the intraspecific competitions. Furthermore, we hypothesized that as the density of the intraspecific and interspecific competition species increased, then the production of the plants (by ave, weight in grams) would go down.MATERIALS AND METHODSSix weeks previous to the conductance of this lab, Biology 108 section,planted wheat and mustard plants according to display board1 on page 3 of the Principles of Biology 108 Lab Manual . This table depicts all of the total pots and number and type of seeds planted in the pots. It accounts for the experiments of the intraspecific competition and interspecific competition. Replicates of each pot were planted to add precision and more acceptable statistics. Therefore, there were 40 pots, that is, 20 treatments conducted twice(Ciara, 1993).Each Biology 108 section planted these pots and the data from every section was to be combined for an overall data sheet. Our group in section 6 had the role of planting 5 of the experimental pots with the assigned number of wheat seeds or mustard seeds or both.

Middle East foreign policies :: essays research papers

Disaster Fear Terrorism What seemed to be a scene from Die Hard is what struck home in America on Sept. 11. The attacks on the World Trade Center leads back to umteen problems with our foreign relations. Our foreign relations policies have been recently getting a lot of countries angry and frustrated, the major problem being that we interfered with Palestinian and Israeli conflicts by offering war support to Israel. Aiding one side or other is a very tricky business, especially when it involves a religious war.We should have just offered support to try bringing the dickens countries to peace, not military support. Amazingly, the insurance policy of helping Israel still continues, building settlements on what everyone knew was Palestinian land and selling weapons to Israel. We should not have interfered by helping Israel and for so long. It is hard to sit parenthesis and be a spectator during a war, but when it involves religion, I would stay out. Religious wars are fought with a deep vengeance. It would not be the initiatory metre that America has tried to stay out of a war, we have through so in more atrocious wars like the genocide put on by the Nazis. I think America intervened in Israel for more political reasons than anything else.Due to our foreign policy in the Middle East, over the years weve acquired many enemies and adversaries, one of them being Osama Bin Laden. When we set up military bases in Saudi Arabia during and after the Gulf War, it exaggerated Osamas anger because Saudi Arabia houses two of the holiest Islamic shrines. The build up of this anger led to the sad tragedy of the September 11th terrorist attack on America. The point I am stressful to make is that it could have been avoided if we worked on our foreign policy more with Saudi Arabia and Israel and didnt let the anti-American resentment get so strong. Whats done is done, and the only thing we can do now is to learn from our mistakes. I believe the first order of business is t o prosecute Bin Laden and his terrorist faction. The close step is to slowly remove support in Israel. I emphasize slowly because we previously helped them for many years, and cant abruptly end it. The first thing we should wean is the selling of weapons to Israel. Selling weapons to one side of the conflict is pretty much an act of war on Palestine.

Union Organizing

Labor Relations Week 6 Final Paper Union Campaigning bring Campaigning is something that is done in many aspects of life. It breaks down to basically creating arguments to sell yourself or your company to a group of people. President hopefuls set out on a campaign trail every four years to try and get people to vote for them. I al focussings thought that this was the only variation of campaigning, but I was incorrect. Employers and Unions both use campaigning to get exertioners to either avoid, or join a gist. Each side has their own tactics and goals to achieve. I plan to analyze both sides and show the pros and cons of each.Employer campaign tactics start with four key factors that determine take decisions. These factors are job dissatisfaction, mating instrumentality, familiar union attitudes and collective social identity. Employers try to provide schooling to employees consisting of pro-company, anti-union information. Employers use many tactics during their campaign pro cess to attempt to get their workers to avoid joining a union. some(a) of these include sending out letters or email messages with negative aspects of the union organization, or supervisors meeting with employees individually or in small groups.A nonher tactic that works to the advantage of employers is utilizing its private property rights to prohibit outside organizations from entering the workplace and interacting with their workers. A drawback to that tactic is that they have to aver the rule for all organizations, and not exclusively unions. One of the to a greater extent common tactics is the captive audience meeting. This is typically a group meeting held in the workplace during work hours, where employees listen to management describe their antiunion and pro-company presentations.These meetings are completely legal as long as they are not within 24 hours of an election. Employers need to be careful not to cross lines in regards to their tactics. Some of them can be consid ered illegal if they are overly aggressive or threatening. Some of these employer tactics are heavily debated due to their difficulty to measure and observe, so that kind of has the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) keeping an eye on employer tactics, and how they run their campaign. They want to ensure that at that place is no threatening of workers, or any other funny business going on.Union campaign processes similarly target the four key factors of worker complaints within a company. Union inventrs use a vastly antithetical set of tactics to get their information out, and attempt to get a union organized within a workplace. No matter how about labor laws attempt to regulate the balance of rights during union and employer campaigning processes, the employers always seem to have more power over their property, and their employees. Unions need to get creative with their campaigning. Unions have some disadvantages against them because they cannot show workers instant result s. kind of they refer a lot of what seems like empty promises that they need to fulfill if they are successful during their campaign. One of their tactics that they use to get in fulfil with workers is by accessing the Excelsior List. The Excelsior List is simply a list of the names and addresses of employees eligible to vote in the election. Employers must provide this list to the union organizers to comply with a rule the NLRB established in 1966. Unions then utilize the list to send out mailings or set up home visits by a union representative to speak with the worker directly.A distinct disadvantage to using this list is that a lot of workers may view it as an invasion of privacy, and choose not to speak with the union representative. Alternatively, with the advance of technology, unions are now utilizing the Internet and web pages to help distribute information without violating an employees privacy. In comparison with employer campaigning, unions definitely have a more passiv e approach. Unions also have to recognize that different campaign tactics work better for different sets of workers. There is a lot to consider when establishing a campaign.Now, there can be significant problems with each side of the campaign process. Each side has to hold open their role while providing the undeniable information desired, and stay within the legal guidelines set forth by the NLRB. Employers must be careful not to make any of their statements seem like threats of unemployment or wage deduction. Our textbook explains this perfectly. Predictions based on objective facts that some events will likely occur because of forces beyond the employers ensure are legal statements that convey the impression that these events are inevitable or at the discretion of the employer are threats. (McGraw-Hill, page 246) Employers tend to be watched more closely in these circumstances, since they have a more direct access to their workers, obviously. While the NLRB cannot monitor ever ything, the workers can report any inappropriate behavior should it occur. For instance, while a campaign is in process and an election is approaching, employers are not allowed to question workers on their stance regarding unions. This could lead to an employee giving his or her stance, and the employer terminating the employment to avoid them voting for the union, which is not allowed.Also, if employers choose to activate their privacy protection, and choose not to allow solicitors, they must remain active and apply that rule to all organizations, not just unions. Employers tend to have the advantage in the campaign process, since they can hire consultants and reach the workers directly, as stated. Some of these consultants can make matters worse, by starting rumors, sexual congress lies and blowing things out of context. Our text outlines a particularly extreme case in which a 17 year employee with no record of violence challenged his plant conductor to let the employees talk to a union organizer.The following day the employer notified the local sheriff that this employee was threatening workers so the sheriffs deputies surrounded him at gunpoint on his way to work and forcibly took him to the local hospital. Based on what the employer told the sheriff, the employee was involuntarily committed to a mental hospital. He was held for two weeks against his will and forcibly injected with anti-psychotic drugs until a lawyer could obtain his release. This happened in 1999, in South Carolina. (McGraw-Hill, p. 248) Reading that is a real eye-opener to how serious this subject can get.The union side of campaign runs into fewer issues, chiefly because of their lack of contact with workers. They are only permitted certain things, and often lack the funds to do much more than their mailings and home visits. One thing that they do have to their advantage is anonymity. Some unions are so bold as to send some of their paid union organizers into an employer to try to ge t hired as employees They are referred to as salts, since the union thinks they salt or enrich the workplace by spreading news about union in non-work areas to attempt to organize the workers.I think this is actually a brilliant idea to get in under the radar and make some headway if youre a union trying to organize. And actually, it is considered legal, after the Supreme Court ruled that they are employees protected against discrimination in hiring and firing. (McGraw-Hill, p. 247) Some states are considered at-will, or right to work states, and there are special rules for them regarding unions. The Taft-Hartley Act outlawed the closed-shop rule regarding unions. Closed shop referred to employees at unionized workplaces being required to join the union as a condition of employment.The Act did permit a new union shop, which required all new employees to join the union after a minimum period of time after their hire. Under union shop rules, employers are obliged to fire any employees who have avoided paying membership dues necessary to maintain membership in the union however the union cannot demand that the employer discharge an employee who has been expelled from membership for any other reason. (Wikipedia) Some people think that there should be limits set forth to campaigning and union organizing.I agree that there should be some limits set to both sides of this debate. I think that unions should not be allowed to make home visits and invade their privacy. I also think that there should be more strict rules enforcing policies for the employers. I think that it is un bazaar for employers to objurgate their workers simply for getting information on other options for their benefits and happiness. I dont know how they can enforce these things in the future, but it simply is not fair for employees to be discriminated against, or put in fear of their jobs or benefits.That could be considered bullying. I think that maybe when it comes to union elections, the NLRB should send in more representatives, and maybe they can have a debate with employer management, and a union organizer, to allow both sides of an argument to be heard in a fair and dignified way, as opposed to simply campaigning, and talking bad about the other side. References Wikipedia http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Taft-Hartley_Act Textbook Budd, Labor Relations Striking a Balance, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill 2008.